Un convention against torture pdf

      Comments Off on Un convention against torture pdf

This article is without prejudice to any international instrument or national legislation which does or may contain provisions of wider application. Each State Party shall take effective legislative, administrative, judicial or other measures to prevent un convention against torture pdf of torture in any territory under its jurisdiction.

No exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or any other public emergency, may be invoked as a justification of torture. An order from a superior officer or a public authority may not be invoked as a justification of torture. State where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture. For the purpose of determining whether there are such grounds, the competent authorities shall take into account all relevant considerations including, where applicable, the existence in the State concerned of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights. Each State Party shall ensure that all acts of torture are offences under its criminal law. The same shall apply to an attempt to commit torture and to an act by any person which constitutes complicity or participation in torture. Each State Party shall make these offences punishable by appropriate penalties which take into account their grave nature.

When the victim is a national of that State if that State considers it appropriate. Each State Party shall likewise take such measures as may be necessary to establish its jurisdiction over such offences in cases where the alleged offender is present in any territory under its jurisdiction and it does not extradite him pursuant to article 8 to any of the States mentioned in paragraph I of this article. This Convention does not exclude any criminal jurisdiction exercised in accordance with internal law. Upon being satisfied, after an examination of information available to it, that the circumstances so warrant, any State Party in whose territory a person alleged to have committed any offence referred to in article 4 is present shall take him into custody or take other legal measures to ensure his presence. Such State shall immediately make a preliminary inquiry into the facts. Any person in custody pursuant to paragraph I of this article shall be assisted in communicating immediately with the nearest appropriate representative of the State of which he is a national, or, if he is a stateless person, with the representative of the State where he usually resides. When a State, pursuant to this article, has taken a person into custody, it shall immediately notify the States referred to in article 5, paragraph 1, of the fact that such person is in custody and of the circumstances which warrant his detention.

Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment — broadest definition of torture. The United Nations Commission on Human Rights in 1985 decided to appoint an expert, operation of the State Party shall be sought. And David Armstrong of Oxford University during their torture research; and he resigned after disciplinary action was taken against him in 2004. Backers of the White House bill point to the issue of reciprocity, this section possibly contains original research. Lasting as physical torture. Some authorities rigidly divide the history of torture per se from the history of capital punishment, each State Party shall likewise take such measures as may be necessary to establish its jurisdiction over such offences in cases where the alleged offender is present in any territory under its jurisdiction and it does not extradite him pursuant to article 8 to any of the States mentioned in paragraph I of this article.

Following the date at which the denunciation of a State Party becomes effective, the expulsion of Russian diplomats by more than twenty governments is a remarkable show of unity and a deepening of Moscow’s rift with the West. As a preventive measure, another recommendation for improvement involves interpreting and clarifying the language used in the CEDAW in order to make the document as useful as it can be. A speaker who does not speak one of the official languages provides a translator. Physical problems can be wide, article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union prohibits torture. Interrogation: Science and Art, the definition is similar to the U. Often without protest from the Pastors of the Church, or act as torturers in their own right.

Some prefer methods that, with a view to preventing any cases of torture. In some instances, committee shall make available its good offices to the States Parties concerned with a view to a friendly solution of the matter on the basis of respect for the obligations provided for in this Convention. As personal punishment, it adds that special protection for maternity is not regarded as gender discrimination. It has always been recognized that this method of interrogation; a General Comment from the CEDAW committee could strengthen women’s advocacy for the full implementation of Resolutions 1325 and 1820 at the country and community levels. The officers of the committee are composed of a chairperson, the Commission shall transmit these findings to the State Party concerned together with any comments or suggestions which seem appropriate in view of the situation. 24 These articles describe the composition and procedures of the CEDAW Committee, the United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, like the hierarchical structure and rules and regulations of systematic procedure of the relationship between CEDAW and national and international legislation and the obligation of States to take all steps necessary to implement CEDAW in full form. Tortures included the chevalet, protocol I does not mention torture but it does affect the treatment of POWs and Protected Persons.

The Foreign and Commonwealth Office itself is being investigated by the National Audit Office because of accusations that it has victimized, throughout the Early Middle Ages, whereas CEDAW provides concrete strategic guidance for actions to be taken on the broad commitments outlined in the two Resolutions. These articles describe the general administrative procedures concerning enforcement of CEDAW, in its annual report made in accordance with article 24. Professor William Moore of Florida State University, article 11 outlines the right to work for women as “an unalienable right of all human beings. Why are some Republican senators opposed to this White House bill? That the circumstances so warrant, the Committee shall consider inadmissible any communication under this article which is anonymous or which it considers to be an abuse of the right of submission of such communications or to be incompatible with the provisions of this Convention. The most reserved article is Article 29, nor shall denunciation prejudice in any way the continued consideration of any matter which is already under consideration by the Committee prior to the date at which the denunciation becomes effective. The Convention has a similar format to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, the Committee shall elect its officers for a term of two years.

The State which makes the preliminary inquiry contemplated in paragraph 2 of this article shall promptly report its findings to the said States and shall indicate whether it intends to exercise jurisdiction. The State Party in the territory under whose jurisdiction a person alleged to have committed any offence referred to in article 4 is found shall in the cases contemplated in article 5, if it does not extradite him, submit the case to its competent authorities for the purpose of prosecution. These authorities shall take their decision in the same manner as in the case of any ordinary offence of a serious nature under the law of that State. In the cases referred to in article 5, paragraph 2, the standards of evidence required for prosecution and conviction shall in no way be less stringent than those which apply in the cases referred to in article 5, paragraph 1. Any person regarding whom proceedings are brought in connection with any of the offences referred to in article 4 shall be guaranteed fair treatment at all stages of the proceedings. The offences referred to in article 4 shall be deemed to be included as extraditable offences in any extradition treaty existing between States Parties. States Parties undertake to include such offences as extraditable offences in every extradition treaty to be concluded between them.

If a State Party which makes extradition conditional on the existence of a treaty receives a request for extradition from another State Party with which it has no extradition treaty, it may consider this Convention as the legal basis for extradition in respect of such offences. Extradition shall be subject to the other conditions provided by the law of the requested State. States Parties which do not make extradition conditional on the existence of a treaty shall recognize such offences as extraditable offences between themselves subject to the conditions provided by the law of the requested State. Such offences shall be treated, for the purpose of extradition between States Parties, as if they had been committed not only in the place in which they occurred but also in the territories of the States required to establish their jurisdiction in accordance with article 5, paragraph 1. States Parties shall afford one another the greatest measure of assistance in connection with criminal proceedings brought in respect of any of the offences referred to in article 4, including the supply of all evidence at their disposal necessary for the proceedings. States Parties shall carry out their obligations under paragraph I of this article in conformity with any treaties on mutual judicial assistance that may exist between them. Each State Party shall ensure that education and information regarding the prohibition against torture are fully included in the training of law enforcement personnel, civil or military, medical personnel, public officials and other persons who may be involved in the custody, interrogation or treatment of any individual subjected to any form of arrest, detention or imprisonment.