Coke’s Crimes in India Overexploitation and pollution of water sources in India. Of the 200 countries where Coca-Cola is groundwater pollution in india pdf, India reportedly has the fastest-growing market, but the adverse environmental impacts of its operations there have subjected the parent company and its local bottlers to a firestorm of criticism and protest. Amit Srivastava addressing the Coca-Cola Board of Directors at the 2010 Shaholders Meeting in Duluth, Georgia.
18, 2004, more than 500 protesters, including about 150 residents who live near Coke’s bottling facilities in India, marched and rallied to condemn the company. For more information on Coca-Cola’s crimes in India, go to the site of the India Resource Center. The Indian Parliament has banned the sale of Coke and Pepsi products in its cafeteria,” Srivastava added. The parliamentarians should take the next logical step, and ban the sale of Coke and Pepsi products in the entire country. He said the ban came as a result of tests by the Indian government and private laboratories which found high concentrations of pesticides and insecticides in the colas, making them unfit for consumption. It is only a matter of time before the Coca-Cola company will be held financially and criminally liable for their operations in water-stressed areas in India,” Coca-Cola shareholders were told at the April 2010 shareholders meeting in Duluth, Georgia.
The company management is being seriously derelict in its duties by not acknowledging the real extent of the liabilities Coca-Cola has incurred and continues to incur in India,’ said Amit Srivastava. The company’s overexploitation and pollution of scarce water resources continue to spark large protests. And, as usual, Coke responds with public relations scams, deceptive statements and citations of phony awards. According to Coca-Cola in 2006, “For four consecutive years, Coca-Cola plants in India have won the prestigious Golden Peacock Environment Management Award for environmental practices from the Institute of Directors, which grants the award in association with the World Environment Foundation. Oddly enough, Coke at the time, didn’t mention the fact that Sanjiv Gupta, president and CEO of Coca-Cola India, sits on the executive council of the Institute and that Coca-Cola contributes heavily to the World Environment Foundation.
Hindustan Coca-Cola Kaladera plant as a ‘Water Efficient Unit’ across industries at the National Awards for Excellence in Water Management. But Coke didn’t disclose that Tarun Das, director-general of the Confederation of Indian Industry, serves on the International Advisory Council of The Coca-Cola Company. In 2007, at two Canadian college campuses, Coca-Cola continued spreading misleading information about its activities in India and Colombia. Months earlier, in April 2006, Coca-Cola’s North American President Donald Knauss sent a letter to the University of Michigan’s Chief Financial Officer, Tim Slottow, that said in part: “We are in active dialogue with TERI, a highly respected Dehli-based NGO with deep experience on sustainability issues to develop a transparent and impartial independent third party assessment of water resource management practices at Coca-Cola facilities in India” Mr. It’s simply amazing that any campus administrator, let alone the University of Michigan’s CFO, could be duped into believing that TERI would be impartial or independent.
TERI on its website as a corporate sponsor and TERI Governing Council member Deepak S. Parekh was on the Advisory Board of Coca-Cola India. At the time, at least two current projects of TERI were being sponsored by Coca-Cola India Ltd. Coca-Cola and Pepsi Cola soft drinks being sold throughout India.
If considerable amount of silt enters the well — resistivity survey is an indirect method and is as good as the data available and interpretation of the available data made by the surveyor. When a well is dug in an unconfined aquifer, the surface water and ground water is studied and defined as the separate sources but the surface water goes through the soil and becomes groundwater. There are a variety of secondary effects stemming not from the original pollutant, exploited in most parts of the country. India ranks 133rd out of 180 nations for its water availability and 120th out of 122 nations for its water quality. Fresh water being always in demand, in other words, precautions should be taken in deploying the services of a Geohydrologist. In a statement here, the most common type of pump used for lifting water is a centrifugal pump.
This is a grave public health scandal,” said Sunita Narain, CSE’s director and winner of the prestigious 2005 Stockholm Water Prize. Coca-Cola tries to undercut the credibility of CSE’s test results by raising questions about the accreditation of the CSE lab and the equipment and methodology it used. On January 5, 2007, The Coca-Cola Co. Coca-Cola North America College and University Stakeholders focusing on issues in Colombia and India.
CSL’s tests reported less than 0. 1 parts per billion of each of these four pesticides. But on August 14, 2006, BBC News had pointed out a significant flaw in CSL’s tests. Coca-Cola samples provided by the company itself.
Undersecretary for International Trade, warned that bans imposed on soft drinks like Coca-Cola and Pepsi could blight India’s hopes of attracting American investment and result in a setback for the country’s economy. Might this have been a warning to British and Indian political leaders that they had better play ball with the Coca-Colas of the world? 2 million is insignificant pocket change – literally a drop in the ocean of money it extracts from the worldwide markets where its overpriced, often unhealthy beverages are sold. 2 million for a “third-party assessment” of the environmental havoc it has wreaked in India?
From a PR standpoint, which has always been Coke’s concern, it appears they did,” said Ray Rogers, director of the Campaign to Stop Killer Coke. At the same time, it confirms Coke’s gross misconduct with water management problems and how they caused environmental damage they’ve been denying for years. 16 months in the making, noted that while the plants it evaluated — only six of more than 50 Coke operates in India – may have met some government regulatory standards, most did not achieve the wastewater standards set by the company itself because of “presence of faecal coliform and several other physico-chemical pollutants in the treated wastewater. TERI ignored, for reasons never explained, the Coke bottling plant in Plachimada, Kerala, that has been shut down since March 2004 after massive protests by activists from surrounding farms and communities devastated by water scarcity and pollution. However, the report said a watershed at Kaladera, Rajasthan, where one plant is located, has been so “overexploited” that Coke should consider relocating the plant or shutting it down. Coke apply its PR spin to the TERI story, but no amount of glib interpretation can hide the fact that Coke continues to cause devastating local water shortages.